Cases 51 - 60 of 534
Davlin v. Frakes
as 8:2022cv00301
Petitioner:
Clifford J. Davlin
Defendant:
Scott R. Frakes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford Reid v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12248
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLIFFORD LEON REID
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Rush v. Frakes
as 4:2022cv03115
Petitioner:
Clifford L. Rush
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford Jackson v. Neil McDowell
as 22-55607
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLIFFORD D. JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Eaton, Clifford v. Keyes, Randy
as 3:2022cv00308
Petitioner:
Clifford Eaton
Respondent:
Randy Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eagle v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00118
Petitioner:
Clifford W. Eagle
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reid v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00359
Petitioner:
Clifford Leon Reid
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv00141
Petitioner:
Eugene Clifford
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford Elswick v. Dennis Reagle
as 22-1057
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLIFFORD J. ELSWICK
Respondent / Appellee:
DENNIS REAGLE, Warden
Madison v. State of Alabama
as 7:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Clifford Sinclair Madison
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
