Cases 51 - 60 of 1,022
Garcia v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
Dante Diaz Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Diaz v. Warden
as 9:2023cv00250
Petitioner:
Abel Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Diaz, Wilfredo v. Buesgen, Christopher
as 3:2023cv00107
Petitioner:
Wilfredo Diaz
Respondent:
Christopher Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00083
Petitioner:
Miguel Moran Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv20572
Plaintiff:
Miguel Moran Diaz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Rokosky et al
as 5:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
Dante Diaz Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Diaz v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00038
Petitioner:
Cesar Diaz
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Donivan Diaz v. Raymond Madden
as 23-55061
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONIVAN DIAZ
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Reynold Amaury v. Barraza
as 1:2023cv00073
Petitioner:
Pereyra Diaz Reynold Amaury
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Diaz v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2022cv00683
Petitioner:
Enrique Diaz
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
