Cases 51 - 60 of 10,191
Carpenter v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00322
Petitioner:
Matthew A Carpenter
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Becerra v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv01100
Petitioner:
Erik Becerra
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv04188
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ, WARDEN R. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hooks v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
Elzie Wayne Hooks, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reginald Strother v. USA
as 24-1441
Petitioner:
REGINALD STROTHER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McGinnis v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv10712
Petitioner:
Scott Martin McGinnis
Respondent:
FBOP, FCI Elkton, Warden F. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chilton v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Brett Michaels Chilton
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henderson v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Tillman Henderson
Respondent:
United States of America and Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marcus Allen v. John Yates
as 24-1565
Plaintiff:
Marcus Allen
Defendant:
United States of America and John P. Yates
CORDERO-REZABALA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv04010
Petitioner:
JORGE EMILIO CORDERO-REZABALA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
