Cases 61 - 70 of 3,579
Westbrook v. F C I - Pollock
as 1:2023cv01356
Plaintiff:
Devion Westbrook
Defendant:
F C I - Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oziel Cantu v. F. Bowers
as 23-5853
Petitioner / Appellant:
OZIEL CANTU
Respondent / Appellee:
F. J. BOWERS, Warden
Alarcon v. Adult Parol Board et al
as 1:2023cv00824
Petitioner:
Luis F Alarcon
Respondent:
Adult Parol Board, Kristine Ring, Amy Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Richardson v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv04770
Petitioner:
Gregory F. Richardson and Gregory Fitzgerald Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Waltman v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Glenn Everett Waltman
Defendant:
F Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barker-Hernandez v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Barker-Hernandez
Defendant:
F Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chatman, Sr. v. State of Indiana, The et al
as 3:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Albert D.M. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana, The, (f/n/u) Reddman, (f/n/u) Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ruiz-Esparza v. F C I Pollock
as 1:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
Erick Ruiz-Esparza
Defendant:
Warden F C I Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Houston v. Garza
as 1:2023cv01483
Petitioner:
Derrick Houston
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Newton v. Garza
as 1:2023cv01475
Petitioner:
Sye Newton
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
