Cases 61 - 70 of 2,975
Joseph Michael Andrews v. Patrick Covello
as 2:2024cv00984
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Andrews
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrew Hoffman v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10347
Petitioner:
ANDREW E. HOFFMAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Mitchell v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Andrew Mitchell
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Andrews v. Covello
as 5:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Andrews
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McMillan v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Andrew McMillan
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrence Downey v. Andrew Ciolli
as 24-1124
Petitioner:
TYRENCE DOWNEY
Respondent:
ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden
Norvell Andrew v. Warden Jacob Doerer
as 5:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Norvell Andrew
Respondent:
Warden USP Victorville and Warden Jacob Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MCKNIGHT v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
EDWARD MCKNIGHT
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, JUDGE PALUMBO, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dewald v. Hollenbaugh et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Dewald
Respondent:
Ken Hollenbaugh and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Owens
as 1:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Andrew Thurston Murphy
Respondent:
Craig D. Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
