Cases 61 - 70 of 587
Jackson v. Harrison
as 3:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Victor Jackson, II
Defendant:
Warden C. Harrison
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harrison v. Smith
as 3:2023cv01450
Petitioner:
David Scott Harrison
Respondent:
Oak Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Harrison County, Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath Gomez
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00204
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee Harrison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00165
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee Harrison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00069
Petitioner:
Isaac Harrison
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jason Harrison v. Peter Bludworth, et al
as 23-35138
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON ROBERT HARRISON
Respondent / Appellee:
PETER BLUDWORTH and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00628
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donnell v. Harrison
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Raphael L. Donnell
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Harrison
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Herbert Baldridge v. Jeff Tanner
as 23-1039
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERBERT DEWEY BALDRIDGE
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF TANNER, Acting Warden, Gus Harrison Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
