Cases 61 - 70 of 419,180
Hayes v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00772
Petitioner:
Dylan Thomas Hayes
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Durham (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01728
Petitioner:
Jeffery S. Durham
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mason v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hernando)
as 8:2024cv01491
Petitioner:
George Mason
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marquetti v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2024cv01497
Petitioner:
Leonel Marquetti
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paty v. Castro
as 7:2024cv00815
Petitioner:
Lacey M Paty
Respondent:
Castro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01052
Petitioner:
JOSEPH JOHNSON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jose Herrada v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-12012
Petitioner:
JOSE HERRADA
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Melvin Tyler v. Sherie Korneman
as 24-2251
Petitioner:
Melvin Leroy Tyler
Respondent:
Sherie Korneman, Warden, WMCC
Jason Krumback v. Teresa Bittinger, et al
as 24-2254
Petitioner:
Jason Krumback
Respondent:
Teresa L. Bittinger, Warden and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Ward v. Preble County Court of Common Pleas - Probation Department
as 3:2024cv00178
Petitioner:
Christopher Ward
Respondent:
Preble County Court of Common Pleas - Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
