Cases 81 - 90 of 1,022
Diaz v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00656
Petitioner:
Rolando L Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00654
Petitioner:
Rolando L Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00655
Petitioner:
Rolando L Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Keyser
as 22-1678
Petitioner / Appellant:
Angel Diaz
Respondent / Appellee:
William F. Keyser
Brian Diaz v. Birkholz
as 2:2022cv05144
Petitioner:
Brian Diaz
Respondent:
Warden Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Diaz v. Hames et al
as 4:2022cv00134
Petitioner:
Nadya Ivette Diaz
Respondent:
Adam Hames, Matthew Kyle Winchester, United States District Court ND GA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2022cv02221
Petitioner:
Camilo Diaz, Jr.
Respondent:
Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Diaz v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00051
Petitioner:
Luis A. Diaz
Respondent:
Warden Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez-Diaz v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00056
Petitioner:
Jair Eudoro Ramirez-Diaz
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dominic Souto Diaz v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 22-2026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOMINIC SOUTO DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
