General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 428
Stone v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00595
Petitioner: Brandon Lee Stone
Respondent: Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner: ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone v. Waxahachie Parole Division We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00577
Petitioner: Frederick Stone
Respondent: Waxahachie Parole Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone (PS) v. Fairbairn et al
as 1:2024cv00569
Petitioner: Dale S. Stone and Dale S. Garcia
Respondent: Mark Fairbairn and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone v. LeMaster
as 0:2024cv00001
Petitioner: Elijah J. Stone
Respondent: David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02199
Petitioner: ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dante' Stone v. Scott Jordan
as 23-6006
Petitioner / Appellant: DANTE' CORVETTE STONE
Respondent / Appellee: SCOTT JORDAN
(HC) Stone v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01441
Petitioner: Nicholas Scott Stone
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nicholas S. Stone v. Warden
as 2:2023cv07639
Petitioner: Nicholas S. Stone
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone v. U S P Pollock et al
as 1:2023cv01189
Plaintiff: Ronald Stone
Defendant: U S P Pollock, Warden Cox and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?