Cases 1 - 10 of 1,067
Wright v. State of South Carolina
as 9:2024cv03557
Petitioner:
Timothy James Wright
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Human Services
as 3:2024cv00253
Petitioner:
Samantha Wright
Respondent:
Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2024cv03441
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Wright
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuller v. Spartanburg County et al
as 6:2024cv03449
Plaintiff:
Deandre L Fuller
Defendant:
Spartanburg County and Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
(HC) Young v. Wright
as 2:2024cv01524
Petitioner:
Corvin J. Young
Respondent:
Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WRIGHT v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00238
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER M. WRIGHT
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Young v. Wright et al.
as 9:2024cv03114
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Honorable Alan Wilson, Donald J Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rickey Benson v. J. Fields and/or Subordinates, et al
as 24-5377
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
J. FIELDS, Chief Jailer and/or subordinates and DEPUTY WRIGHT
Young v. Wright
as 9:2024cv01898
Petitioner:
Corvin J. Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Franklin Wright v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1614
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WRIGHT
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
