Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Appling v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv10124
Petitioner:
Donald Darnell Appling
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington
Appling v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv13040
Petitioner:
Donald Darnell Appling
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington
Jackson v. Apple
as 22-2808
Petitioner / Appellant:
Harold Jackson
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Respondent / Appellee:
Sheriff Craig Apple
Apple v. Officer Chris Young et al
as 1:2022cv00309
Petitioner:
Brandon Apple
Respondent:
Officer Chris Young and Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickett v. Apple et al
as 9:2022cv00697
Petitioner:
Brian Pickett
Respondent:
Craig D. Apple, Sr. and Michael J. Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Apple
as 9:2022cv00157
Petitioner:
Harold Jackson
Respondent:
Sheriff Craig Apple and People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Apples v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 2:2021cv00142
Petitioner:
Alexis A Apples
Respondent:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Montes v. Morton
as 9:2021cv00376
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of New York, Craig D. Apple, Sr. and Robert Morton, Jr.
Petitioner:
Germaine Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Purvis-Mitchell v. Bacon et al
as 9:2020cv01224
Respondent:
Craig Apple, Antoinette T. Bacon and Director of United States Marshal Service
Petitioner:
Tyler Purvis-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Feng v. County of San Francisco et al
as 4:2019cv07228
Respondent:
Amy Yim, County of San Francisco and Rochelle East
Petitioner:
Karena A. Feng and Karena Apple Feng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
