Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Evans v. Coffee Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00212
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Evans, III
Respondent:
Coffee Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Albright v. Kris Karberg
as 23-2578
Petitioner / Appellant:
Charles Raymond Albright
Respondent / Appellee:
Kris Karberg, Warden, Anamosa State Penitentiary
Albright v. Karberg
as 1:2022cv00105
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Albright
Respondent:
Kristofer Karberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albright v. Karbert
as 1:2022xc00104
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Albright
Respondent:
Kris Karbert and Kris Karberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albright v. Karberg
as 3:2022cv03033
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Albright
Respondent:
Kris Karberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Read v. King County Superior Court et al
as 2:2012cv00707
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Read
Respondent:
King County Superior Court and Michael Heavey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2012cv00701
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Read
Respondent:
King County Superior Court, Department 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v.Thaler
as 1:2010cv00401
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Lee, Jr.
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman and Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Lee, Jr. v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-50402
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES RAYMOND LEE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Lee v. Quarterman
as 1:2007cv00261
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Lee, Jr.
Respondent:
Nathanal Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
