Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ferguson v. State of Arkansas et al
as 5:2021cv05209
Plaintiff:
Darla Ferguson
Defendant:
State of Arkansas and Warden Faust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darla Sheffield v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-40742
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARLA MARIE SHEFFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Darla Sheffield v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-41545
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARLA MARIE SHEFFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Darla Sheffield v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-41092
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARLA MARIE SHEFFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Darla Ray Jones v. D. K. Johnson
as 2:2015cv01376
Respondent:
D. K. Johnson
Petitioner:
Darla Ray Jones
Sheffield v. Stephens
as 3:2014cv00322
Petitioner:
Darla Marie Sheffield
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sheffield v. Stephens
as 6:2014cv00395
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Darla Marie Sheffield
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoover v. NV. Board of Parole Commissioners et al
as 3:2014cv00021
Respondent:
Danny Abrein, I. Baca, Dave Bochalo and others
Petitioner:
Keith Shanon Hoover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perales et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv02172
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States Internal Revenue Service, USA, U.S. Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Myers v. Palmer et al
as 3:2011cv00464
Petitioner:
Edward Myers
Defendant:
Darla Palmer , Bryan Buckley and Rebecca Mansell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
