General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
RICHARDSON v. MCFADDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00253
Petitioner: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent: D. EDWARD MCFADDEN and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RICHARDSON v. MCFADDEN
as 2:2016cv05536
Petitioner: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent: DAVID E. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RICHARDSON v. THOMPSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01466
Petitioner: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent: BRIAN THOMPSON, JOHN E. WETZEL and LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Richardson v. Brian Thompson, et al
as 13-2703
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee: BRIAN THOMPSON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Richardson v. Chavis
as 5:2013hc02083
Petitioner: David Louis Richardson
Respondent: Patsy Chavis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Gray
as 5:2012hc02301
Petitioner: David Louis Richardson
Respondent: Lewis Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICHARDSON v. THOMPSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01238
Petitioner: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent: BRIAN THOMPSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Richardson v. Travis Outlaw We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-6750
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID LOUIS RICHARDSON
Respondent - Appellee: TRAVIS OUTLAW
Richardson v. Outlaw
as 5:2011hc02038
Petitioner: David Louis Richardson
Respondent: Travis Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Richardson v. Joseph Mazurkiewicz, et al
as 11-1161
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee: JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ and ATTY GEN PA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?