Cases 1 - 10 of 201
McMurtry v. No Named Defendant
as 24-1175
Petitioner:
GREGG PHILIP MCMURTRY
Respondent:
NO NAMED DEFENDANT
Duvall v. Gregg County Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Steven Lee Duvall
Respondent:
Gregg County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMurtry v. Gregg County Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Justin Matthew McMurtry
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ and Gregg County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duvall v. Gregg County Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Steven Lee Duvall
Respondent:
State Of Texas and Gregg County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Royal v. Gregg County et al
as 6:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Devin Benard Royal
Defendant:
Gregg County, Jeffery K. Hale and Gregg County District Clerk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zindell v. Salmonsen
as 4:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Gregg Allen Zindell
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Brown
as 4:2023cv02459
Petitioner:
Anthony Gregg Williams
Respondent:
Sheriff Marian Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riddle v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv00853
Petitioner:
Gregg Riddle
Respondent:
Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crampton v. McGraw et al
as 2:2023cv00132
Petitioner:
Gregg Crampton
Respondent:
Pat McGraw, Ed Hall and Union County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregg v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00605
Petitioner:
Dwight Richard Gregg
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
