Cases 1 - 10 of 172
HUTCHINSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
JALEN HUTCHINSON and JALEN MICHAEL CHRISTO HUTCHINSON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DRUMMOND v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
KEITH DRUMMOND
Respondent:
JANET HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Schnurr
as 23-3255
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL SCHNURR, Warde, Hutchinson Correctional Facility
RASHID v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00331
Petitioner:
MASHIYAT RASHID
Respondent:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WISE v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
JOSHUA BLAKE WISE
Defendant:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WISE v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
JOSHUA BLAKE WISE
Respondent:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ADAMS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2023cv00254
Petitioner:
DENICO ADAMS
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN L. HUTCHINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Love v. Schnurr
as 23-3150
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEVI LOVE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN SCHNURR, Warden, Hutchinson Correctional Facility
Hutchinson v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Fitzgerald Hutchinson
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARTLETT v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00212
Petitioner:
ALAN M. BARTLETT and Alan Michael Bartlett
Defendant:
JANET HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
