General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lang v. Jones
as 3:2023cv00605
Petitioner: James Ellis Lang
Respondent: Ladeidra N. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crockett v. Haynes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv06211
Petitioner: James Ellis Crockett
Respondent: Superintendent Ron Hayes and Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chandler v. Davis
as 4:2019cv04892
Petitioner: James Ellis Chandler
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ellis v. Amsberry
as 2:2019cv01617
Petitioner: Patric James Ellis
Respondent: Brigitte Amsberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ellis v. Superintendent
as 3:2016cv00715
Petitioner: James Ellis, Jr
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ellis v. Werlich We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00737
Petitioner: Russell James Ellis
Respondent: Warden Werlich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eugene Ellis v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-20537
Petitioner - Appellant: EUGENE JAMES ELLIS
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Eugene Ellis v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-20538
Petitioner - Appellant: EUGENE JAMES ELLIS, also known as Jarry James Oliver
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ellis v. Quarterman
as 08-20554
Petitioner - Appellant: EUGENE JAMES ELLIS
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ellis v. Quarterman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv02768
Petitioner: Eugene James Ellis
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?