Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Wingfield v. Warden, FCC Coleman-1
as 5:2023cv00562
Petitioner:
James H Wingfield and James H. Wingfield
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JOHNSON v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
JAMES H. JOHNSON
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Proctor, Jr. v. Warden of SCI-Houtzdale et al
as 3:2023cv01323
Petitioner:
James H. Proctor, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Houtzdale, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and District Attorney of Monroe County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BENDYNA v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
JAMES H BENDYNA
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James Hayes v. Jerry Howell, et al
as 22-15940
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES H. HAYES
Respondent / Appellee:
JERRY HOWELL, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Spikes v. Looney et al
as 2:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Defendant:
James H Looney and Prentice L White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hayes v. Hutchings
as 2:2022cv00202
Petitioner:
James H Hayes
Respondent:
William Hutchings and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coulter v. State of Washington
as 3:2021cv05736
Petitioner:
James H Coulter, Jr and James Herbert Coulter, Jr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. LAMMER
as 2:2021cv00277
Petitioner:
JAMES H. JOHNSON
Respondent:
B. LAMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hayes v. Hutchings et al
as 2:2021cv00987
Respondent:
Attorney General of Satte of Nevada and William Hutchings
Petitioner:
James H Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
