Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Goins v. Norwood et al
as 2:2018cv04223
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Joe Norwood
Petitioner:
Robert Carlton Goins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Logan (ID 72032) v. Norwood
as 5:2018cv03177
Petitioner:
Victor M. Logan
Respondent:
Joe Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez-Ramirez v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv04043
Petitioner:
Elidio Perez-Ramirez
Respondent:
Joe Norwood , Shawnee County Department of Corrections , Shawnee County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Brown v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2018cv03118
Plaintiff:
Eugene Edward Brown, III
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Joe Norwood and Sam Cline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanders (ID 85527) v. Norwood
as 5:2018cv03116
Petitioner:
Ronnie Sanders
Respondent:
Joe Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Heath (ID 63392) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2017cv03114
Petitioner:
Glenn A. Heath
Respondent:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Prison Review Board and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson (ID 93050) v. Norwood
as 5:2016cv03247
Petitioner:
Elgin R. Robinson, Jr
Respondent:
Joe Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROUDABUSH v. BUMB et al
as 3:2015cv06554
Petitioner:
JAMES ROUDABUSH, JR.
Respondent:
RENEE MARIE BUMB, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, C.E. SAMUELS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins v. Thomas et al
as 1:2012cv01537
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Collins
Respondent:
Jeff Thomas, Joe Norwood, David Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Allen v. Killian
as 11-64
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jamel Abdula Allen
Respondent - Appellee:
Janice M. Killian, as Warden, Federal Correctional Institution at Otisville, New York and Joe Norwood, as Regional Director, Northeast Region, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
