General Cases
Levi Stoltzfoos v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1772
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEVI LAPP STOLTZFOOS
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Lappe v. Dr. Whitter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00163
Plaintiff: Elmer Lappe
Defendant: Dr. Whitter and John Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Levi Stoltzfoos v. Secretary PA Dept Corr, et al
as 16-1821
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEVI LAPP STOLTZFOOS
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
STOLTZFOOS v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv06747
Petitioner: LEVI LAPP STOLTZFOOS
Respondent: JOHN E. WETZEL, KATHLEEN KANE and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stoltzfoos v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv02688
Petitioner: Levi Lapp Stoltzfoos
Respondent: John E. Wetzel, Kathleen Kane and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lapp v. St. Lucie County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2012cv14455
Plaintiff: Michael F. Lapp
Defendant: St. Lucie County Sheriff's Dept. and St. Lucie County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lappe v. Mental Health Services of Arizona
as 2:2012cv00071
Petitioner: Elmer J Lappe, Jr.
Respondent: Mental Health Services of Arizona, Arizona Behavioral Health Services Department, Mesa Crisis Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lappe v. Cavelo
as 2:2010cv02602
Petitioner: Elmer J Lappe, Jr.
Respondent: Gene Cavelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lappe v. Troutman
as 2:2010cv00959
Petitioner: Elmer J Lappe, Jr
Respondent: Unknown Troutman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?