General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Michael Peterson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6179
Petitioner: MICHAEL ANDREW PETERSON
Respondent: HAROLD W. CLARKE
Joseph Michael Andrews v. Patrick Covello
as 2:2024cv00984
Petitioner: Joseph Michael Andrews
Respondent: Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Covello We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00587
Plaintiff: Joseph Michael Andrews
Defendant: Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Peterson v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00346
Petitioner: Michael Andrew Peterson
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00417
Petitioner: Michael Andrew Peterson
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Andrew Dennis v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv04342
Petitioner: Michael Andrew Dennis
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Dennis v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00834
Petitioner: Michael Andrew Dennis
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCUTERI v. ZATECKY
as 2:2023cv00155
Petitioner: MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCUTERI v. ZATECKY
as 2:2023cv00156
Petitioner: MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Jace v. Ronald Davis
as 22-55241
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL ANDREW JACE
Respondent / Appellee: RONALD DAVIS, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?