Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Williams v. Perry
as 5:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Michael R. Williams
Respondent:
J. Kevin Perry
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. MCMILLEN
as 1:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JEROME WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MCMILLEN and WARDEN MCMILLIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. McMillen
as 1:2023cv04227
Petitioner:
Michael Jerome Williams
Respondent:
Warden McMillen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. St Clair Correctional Facility et al
as 7:2022cv01475
Petitioner:
Michael Terrell Williams
Respondent:
St Clair Correctional Facility and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Britten et al
as 2:2022cv12605
Petitioner:
Michael B. Williams
Respondent:
K. Britten, Michigan Department of Correctional and Kym Worthy
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 22-2299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Michael Williams v. Ron Neal
as 22-1655
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL M. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
RON NEAL
Williams v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00292
Petitioner:
Michael M Williams
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Hutchings
as 2:2021cv01864
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Williams
Defendant:
William Hutchings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Williams v. Robertson
as 1:2021cv01292
Petitioner:
Michael Leon Williams
Respondent:
Jim Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
