Cases 1 - 10 of 387
Dida v. Hvarre
as 1:2024cv01193
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Respondent:
Kimberly Hvarre
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khalil v. State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision Parole Board et al
as 9:2024cv00580
Petitioner:
Ahmed S. Khalil and Ahmed Shawki Mohamed Khalil
Respondent:
State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision Parole Board and Nicole Irby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elnour v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02284
Petitioner:
Mohamed Elnour
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dahir v. Bolin
as 0:2024cv01304
Petitioner:
Mohammed Abdi Dahir
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Mohamed Dida
Respondent:
Kimberly Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khalil v. Farideh P.
as 9:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Ahmed S. Khalil, Ahmed Shawki Mohamed Khalil and Ahmed Q.
Respondent:
Farideh P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kwaning v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02002
Petitioner:
Mohammed Asamoah Kwaning
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mohammed Kwaning v. Warden, FCI Memphis
as 23-6084
Petitioner / Appellant:
MOHAMMED ASAMOAH KWANING
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCI MEMPHIS
Mohammed Ali v. Moore
as 5:2023cv02332
Petitioner:
Juba Mohammed Ali
Respondent:
Rochelle Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohammed v. Stover
as 3:2023cv01574
Petitioner:
Aleah Mohammed
Respondent:
Rick Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
