Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sivak v. Winmill, et al.
as 1:2023cv00014
Petitioner:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Respondent:
Judge B. Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye, M. Douglas Harpool and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NYE v. SHAPIRO et al
as 3:2019cv00218
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, LEO DUNN and JOSH SHAPIRO
Petitioner:
BRIAN LEWIS NYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nye v. Uttecht
as 3:2019cv05398
Respondent:
State of Washington and Jeffrey A Uttecht
Petitioner:
Micah A Nye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nye v. State of Washington
as 4:2019cv05106
Plaintiff:
Micah A Nye
Defendant:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nye v. State of Alabama
as 5:2018cv00554
Petitioner:
James Donald Nye
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gardner v. Marshall et al
as 2:2015cv00631
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Rick Marshall and Nye County Sheriff's Office
Petitioner:
Robin L. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cannabis Garren Nye v. A Gonzalez
as 8:2014cv01490
Respondent:
A Gonzalez
Petitioner:
Cannabis Garren Nye
Edwards v. Nye County District Ct. Judge et al
as 2:2014cv00195
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Nye County District Ct. Judge
Petitioner:
Carl Dean Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maria Padernal-Nye v. Janet Napolitano, et al
as 12-15369
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIA LITA PADERNAL-NYE, AKA Maria Lita Nye
Respondent - Appellee:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, LEANDER HOLSTON and others
Padernal-Nye v. Napolitano et al
as 2:2011cv02058
Respondent:
Steven M. Branch, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Leander Holston and others
Petitioner:
Maria Lita Padernal-Nye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
