Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Martinez v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00845
Petitioner:
Fernando Martinez and Fernando R Martinez
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pipkin v. Martinez et al
as 2:2020cv00848
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of New Mexico and R Martinez
Petitioner:
Robert Lawrence Pipkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Soto et al v. Governor of the State of New Mexico, et al
as 1:2020cv00317
Petitioner:
Patrick Hopkins, Dainte D Sanders, Jonathan Duran and others
Respondent:
Governor of the State of New Mexico and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Lindgrige et al
as 1:2019cv03378
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Lindgrige
Petitioner:
Michael R Martinez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00801
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Officer R. Martinez and New Mexico, State of
Petitioner:
Felix G. Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenneth v. Martinez et al
as 2:2017cv01176
Petitioner:
Eric Paul Kenneth
Respondent:
R. Martinez and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pena v. Martinez
as 5:2017cv00226
Defendant:
Corporal R. Martinez
Plaintiff:
Albert Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Suen v. CSATF Warden et al
as 1:2017cv00207
Petitioner:
David Suen
Respondent:
CSATF Warden, G.B. Winters and R. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craig Williams v. R. Martinez, et al
as 13-5338
Petitioner - Appellant:
Craig Allan Williams
Respondent - Appellee:
R. Martinez, Warden and Ronald C. Machen, Jr., Esquire, United States Attorney for the District of Columbia
Reed v. Samuels Jr et al
as 1:2013cv02521
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
Charles Samuels Jr, III, M D Carvajal, R Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
