Cases 1 - 10 of 663
Clements v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
James Clements
Respondent:
Hector Rios and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arredondo v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Sergio Arredondo
Respondent:
H. Rios and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cavazos v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00309
Petitioner:
Roy G Cavazos
Respondent:
Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glenn Arthur Smith, Jr. v. Melissa Rios Marques et al
as 2:2024cv02298
Petitioner:
Glenn Arthur Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Melissa Rios Marques and Collete S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garnica v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00239
Petitioner:
Juan Pablo Garnica
Defendant:
Hector Rios and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Oscar Rios
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rios v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Fernando Rios
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rios v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Thomas Rios
Respondent:
Warden Williams and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Rios, et al
as 23-2200
Petitioner:
LOUIS GARCIA
Respondent:
HECTOR RIOS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Franklin Rios v. Warden Janson
as 23-7194
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANKLIN ANTONIO RIOS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN JANSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
