Cases 1 - 10 of 23
McCreary v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Roger Lee McCreary
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Davis et al
as 6:2023cv00744
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Carr
Respondent:
Gwendolyn Davis, Steve Marshall and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mays v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Chapman Rogers Mays
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moseley v. Butler
as 1:2022cv00157
Petitioner:
Roger Alan Moseley
Respondent:
Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newburn v. Scully
as 1:2021cv00546
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Newburn
Defendant:
Judge Scully
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. Calhoun et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00364
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Sonya Thompson, CMC Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lanford v. Tipton et al (INMATE 3)
as 5:2020cv01949
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, State of Alabama, Scott Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Glenn Lanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lanford v. Tipton et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00820
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Steven T. Marshall, State of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Glenn Lanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Archilla et al v. Witte et al
as 4:2020cv00596
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Garcia Rivera, Karim Tahir Golding, Landry Emily Mbendeke and others
Respondent:
Matthew T Albence, Dianne Witte, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dixon v. Cooks
as 1:2019cv00026
Plaintiff:
Roger Dixon
Defendant:
Mary Cooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
