Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Buchanon v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
Terry James Buchanon, II
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles, Lynn Head, Sarah C. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Dunn
as 1:2021cv00460
Petitioner:
George Martin
Respondent:
Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Talley v. Toney et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00452
Plaintiff:
Adrian Fitzgerald Talley, Jr.
Defendant:
Deborah Toney, Steven T. Marshall, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McLellan v. Dunn et al
as 2:2021cv00790
Petitioner:
Corderious McLellan
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn, Guy Noe, The Attorney General of the State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trapp v. Dunn et al
as 3:2020cv01955
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Deborah Toney
Petitioner:
Matthew D Trapp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Richie et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00959
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Bullock Correctional Facility, Steven T. Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Kevin Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conner v. Dunn
as 1:2020cv00511
Petitioner:
Willie Lee Conner
Respondent:
Commissioner Jefferson S. Dunn and Kenneth Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Chiarizio v. Murrill et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00582
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Karla Walker Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Chiarizio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stokes v. Robinson et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2020cv00004
Plaintiff:
Vantwain L. Stokes
Defendant:
Scarlotte Robinson, Steven T. Marshall and Jeff S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McMeans v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv01039
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Kay Ivey, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas McMeans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
