Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Sarr-Daffee v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2023cv03584
Petitioner:
Alhaji Sarr-Daffee
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT ROBERT GILMORE and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Kirkpatrick
as 22-1441
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robert A. Griffin
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Robert A. Kirkpatrick
Bonton v. Ercole
as 22-553
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jerry Bonton
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Robert Ercole
Reyes v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2020cv05246
Respondent:
Superintendent Robert Miller and New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Petitioner:
William A. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUSH v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv05816
Petitioner:
LARRY RUSH and LEROY THOMAS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROGERS v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv05663
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
RONALD ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GURU v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv05065
Petitioner:
ASHOK KUMAR GURU
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGuirk v. Roberts
as 2:2019cv00677
Plaintiff:
Terrence Joseph McGuirk
Defendant:
Superintendent Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McGuirk v. Roberts
as 2:2019cv00625
Plaintiff:
Terrence Joseph McGuirk
Defendant:
Superintendent Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WAKEFIELD v. GILMORE
as 2:2019cv00983
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE
Petitioner:
DALE MICHAEL WAKEFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
