Cases 1 - 10 of 27
William Watson v. Limestone CF Warden, et al
as 23-13460
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM DALE WATSON
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and LIMESTONE CF WARDEN
Watson v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2022cv01386
Petitioner:
William Dale Watson
Respondent:
Chadwick Crabtree and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. S.C.D.C. et al
as 4:2022cv01650
Petitioner:
William Dale Allen, Sr and William D. Allen, Sr.
Respondent:
S.C.D.C., The State of South Carolina and Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jaeger v. Graddick et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv01035
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Charles Graddick and Steven T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
William Dale Jeager and William Dale Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Cartledge
as 4:2016cv01765
Petitioner:
William Dale Allen, Sr
Respondent:
Larry Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Holley v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 15-15599
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM DALE HOLLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JULIE L. JONES
HOLLEY v. CREWS
as 3:2014cv00500
Petitioner:
WILLIAM DALE HOLLEY
Respondent:
MICHAEL D CREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Byars et al
as 4:2013cv02826
Petitioner:
William Dale Allen, Sr
Respondent:
Warden Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Texas Attorney General et al
as 4:2013cv02602
Petitioner:
William Dale Carter
Respondent:
Texas Attorney General , Texas Parole Board, Texas Parole Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Carter v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-20458
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM DALE CARTER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
