Cases 161 - 170 of 4,566
Kenneth Eugene Smith v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 22-13781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH EUGENE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Covington v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2022cv02547
Petitioner:
Edward A. Covington
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barbee v. Collier
as 22-70011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Stephen Dale Barbee
Defendant / Appellant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Dennis Crowley
Pizzuto v. Richardson
as 1:2022cv00452
Petitioner:
Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Apanovitch v. Shoop
as 1:2022cv01946
Petitioner:
Anthony C. Apanovich and Anthony C. Apanovitch
Respondent:
Warden Tim Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willie Seth Crain, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13693
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIE SETH CRAIN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Anthony Mungin v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13616
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY MUNGIN
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nicholas Bernard Acklin v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13599
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS BERNARD ACKLIN
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Michael Tisius v. David Vandergriff
as 22-3175
Petitioner:
Michael A. Tisius
Respondent:
David Vandergriff, Warden
Michael David Carruth v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 22-13548
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID CARRUTH
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
