Cases 11 - 20 of 4,560
Belton v. Shoop
as 3:2024cv00655
Petitioner:
Anthony Belton
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel O. Conahan, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10844
Petitioner:
DANIEL O CONAHAN, JR.
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Robert J. Trease v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11135
Petitioner:
ROBERT J TREASE
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Davis, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Polk
as 8:2024cv00860
Petitioner:
Leon Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Polk
as 8:2024cv00861
Petitioner:
Leon Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RANDY HAAG v. TERRA
as 5:2024cv00853
Petitioner:
RANDY HAAG
Respondent:
JOSEPH TERRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
Robinson v. Wexford Health Source et al
as 3:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Willie Robinson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Rob Jeffries, Matthew Swalls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Marshall et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mohammad Sharifi v. Warden Holman CF
as 24-11025
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD SHARIFI
Respondent:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Jesse Allen Morrison v. Leanna Lundy
as 2:2024cv01850
Petitioner:
Jesse Allen Morrison
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
