Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Frank Garcia v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-70001
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK MARTINEZ GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Jones v. Albright et al
as 1:2009cv00398
Petitioner:
Beverly Jo Jones
Respondent:
Frank Albright and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRUITT v. BEARD et al
as 2:2009cv01625
Petitioner:
MICHAEL PRUITT
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS B. FOLINO and FRANK J. TENNIS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Albright et al
as 4:2009cv00722
Petitioner:
Beverly Jo Jones
Respondent:
Frank Albright and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RUSH v. BEARD et al
as 2:2008cv04843
Petitioner:
LARRY RUSH
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS B. FOLINO, FRANK TENNIS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garcia v. Quarterman
as 5:2008cv00062
Petitioner:
Frank Martinez Garcia and Frank Martinez Garcia
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Quarterman
as 08-70002
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
WRIGHT v. BEARD et al
as 3:2007cv00251
Petitioner:
WILLIAM L. WRIGHT, III
Respondent:
JEFFERY A. BEARD, LOUIS S. FOLINO and FRANK TENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
WASHINGTON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv03462
Petitioner:
ANTHONY WASHINGTON
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and FRANK TENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
CHESTER v. HORN, et al
as 2:1999cv04111
Petitioner:
FRANK ROBERT CHESTER
Respondent:
MARTIN HORN , PHILIP JOHNSON , JOSEPH P. MAZURKIEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
