Cases 31 - 40 of 163
Williams v. Trammell
as 15-5029
Petitioner - Appellant:
STERLING B. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Kevin Burns v. Wayne Carpenter
as 14-6089
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN B. BURNS
Respondent - Appellee:
WAYNE CARPENTER, Warden
Thomas Loden, Jr. v. Christopher Epp
as 13-70033
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS EDWIN LODEN, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Dennis McGuire v. Warden Chillicothe Correctiona
as 13-3368
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS B. MCGUIRE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Smith v. Thomas
as 2:2013cv00557
Petitioner:
Willie B Smith, III
Respondent:
Kim T Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
HANNIBAL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv00619
Petitioner:
SHELDON HANNIBAL
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, LOUIS B. FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
McGuire v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2012cv00310
Petitioner:
Dennis B McGuire
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Crawford v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner
as 12-70027
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES RAY CRAWFORD
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Koehler v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2012cv00291
Petitioner:
John Joseph Koehler
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel , Louis B. Folino and Mariroso Lamas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwin Turner v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner, et al
as 12-70003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWIN HART TURNER
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and EMMITT L SPARKMAN, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
