Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Peck v. Naman et al
as 2:2016cv00736
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Peck, Jr.
Defendant:
Julie Naman and Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lester v. Morales
as 5:2016cv00258
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Lester
Defendant:
Edgar Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Robert et al
as 6:2016cv00326
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Charles Robert, State Attorney and Andrew Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barefoot v. Snyder-Norris
as 0:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Barefoot
Defendant:
Jodie L. Snyder-Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Peck v. Bullard
as 2:2015cv02244
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Peck, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael G Bullard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Browder, Jr. v. KY State Prison Officials, et al
as 15-5918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Joe Browder, Jr. v. KY State Prison Officials, et al
as 15-5918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE NOS. 1-6, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Wills v. Ferrara, et al.
as 2:2015cv01091
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Wills
Defendant:
Tom Ferrara, Solano County Medical Department and Claybank Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Morris, III v. Danny White
as 15-6224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ROBERT MORRIS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
DANNY WHITE, Probation Officer, RONALD J. CAVANAUGH, Chief Probation Officer and RYAN HALL, Probation Officer
Jackson v. Clement et al
as 2:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Jackson
Defendant:
B Clement, Laura Mathiason, Jefferson Ovesholser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
