Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Laurent v. Woods et al
as 1:2016cv00452
Plaintiff:
Eugene A Laurent
Defendant:
Mitch G Woods and Jefferson County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diggs v. Wood et al
as 9:2016cv00554
Plaintiff:
Ronald Diggs
Defendant:
Ronald G. Wood, Justin Delisle, Kristen J. Delisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venable v. Stainer et al
as 1:2016cv00589
Plaintiff:
Elvis Venable
Defendant:
M.D. Stainer, Biter, R.F. Busch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Monroe County
as 4:2015cv10182
Plaintiff:
Eddie G. Woods
Defendant:
Monroe County, Pat Ericson, Lisa Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Vreeland v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2013cv03515
Plaintiff:
Delmart E.J.M. Vreeland, II
Defendant:
Celia Schwartz, S. Morgan, G. Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deliser v. Miller et al
as 9:2013cv00803
Plaintiff:
Josue Deliser
Defendant:
J. Miller, Eric R. Nolette and Ronald G. Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deliser v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv00580
Plaintiff:
Josue Deliser
Defendant:
J. Miller, Eric R. Nolette and Ronald G. Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedro Morales v. John Fox, et al
as 12-40111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO MORALES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN B FOX, Complex Warden, Bureau of Prisons Beaumont, JODY R. UPTON, Warden, Bureau of Prisons Beaumont Medium, T. HAMMONDS, CCA at University of Texas Medical Branch, Beaumont Medium and others
Warren Skillern v. Lisa Wood, et al
as 11-15086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN R. SKILLERN
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA G. WOOD, WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR., B. A. EDENFIELD and others
Skillern v. Edenfield et al
as 6:2011cv00088
Plaintiff:
Warren Skillern
Defendant:
B. Avant Edenfield, G.R. Smith and Lisa G. Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
