Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Patten v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
as 1:2013cv01289
Plaintiff:
Jason Patten
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Care Services, Rolando Atienza, Isabel Mathos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Washington et al
as 1:2011cv02590
Plaintiff:
Sherwin S. Perkins
Defendant:
Leila Washington and Robin R. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Seeliger et al
as 1:2010cv02846
Plaintiff:
Sherwin S. Perkins
Defendant:
Clarence Seeliger and Linda Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren F. Arsad, Jr. v. Eduardo C. Robreno, et al
as 09-3922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR., a/k/a The Strawman
Defendant - Appellee:
EDUARDO C ROBRENO, U.S. District Court Judge, HENRY S. PERKIN, Allentown Federal Bldg. and JOHN W. GOLDSBOROUGH, Assistant District Attorney, Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Federal Appeals Dept.
ARSAD v. ROBRENO et al
as 2:2009cv04360
Plaintiff:
WARREN ARSAD
Defendant:
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, HENRY S. PERKIN and JOHN GOLDSBOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Kelley
as 1:2009cv00768
Plaintiff:
Sherwin S. Perkins
Defendant:
Laila A. Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Rios, et al
as 08-20598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLAND S PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
RIOS, Warden, TREVINO, Correctional Officer I, ESQUIVEL, Sergeant and others
Perkins v. Trevino et al
as 7:2008cv00258
Plaintiff:
Roland S. Perkins
Defendant:
Equivel Trevino, Merardo, Nathaniel Quarterman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perkins v. Rios et al
as 4:2008cv02557
Plaintiff:
Roland S. Perkins
Defendant:
Rios, Trevino, Esquivel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perkins v. Kazen et al
as 5:2007cv00777
Plaintiff:
Roland S. Perkins
Defendant:
Phillip Kazen, FNU Monteyer, FNU Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
