Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Stansberry v. Enter White House Admins
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Enter White House Admins
Garrett Sorezo v. White House, et al
as 22-2146
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARRETT MJ TALIF SOREZO
Defendant / Appellee:
WHITE HOUSE, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President, MICHAEL MAIN, Sheriff and others
Redman v. United States of America et al
as 7:2022cv00684
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene Redman, Jr. and Ronald Eugene Reman, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, White House and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Garrett Sorezo v. White House, et al
as 22-2036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARRETT MJ TALIF SOREZO
Defendant / Appellee:
WHITE HOUSE, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President, GEORGE BUSH, SR., Former President and others
Sorezo v. The White House et al
as 2:2022cv12494
Plaintiff:
Garrett MJ Talif Sorezo
Defendant:
The White House, Joe Biden, Michael Main and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Grogan v. USA, et al
as 22-13384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH GROGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Sorezo v. The White House et al
as 1:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Garrett MJ Talif Sorezo
Defendant:
The White House, Joe Biden, Michael Main and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grogan v. United States Government
as 5:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grogan
Defendant:
United States Government, Treasury Department, IRS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mickles v. Gates et al
as 1:2022cv04890
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Bill Gates, Kim Kardasian, Barrack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaime Luevano v. White House Staff
as 22-5032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant / Appellee:
White House Staff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
