Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Thompson v. Bruton, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv01130
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Carnell Thompson
Defendant:
Mark Bruton and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flournoy, Michael v. McKenzie, John et al
as 3:2014cv00554
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Flournoy
Defendant:
John G. McKenzie , United States Attorney Office NDI-WD , Thomas G. Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruton v. Casteel et al
as 3:2014cv00610
Plaintiff:
Mell T. Bruton
Defendant:
Michelle Casteel and Lynn Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Bruton et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00562
Plaintiff:
Isaac Isahas Washington
Defendant:
Mark Bruton and Kenneth Sconyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
Abraham Kelly
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Mark Bruton and Cassandra Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruton v. Napa State Hospital
as 3:2012cv05561
Plaintiff:
David Patrick Bruton
Defendant:
Napa State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Bruton
as 6:2012cv00091
Plaintiff:
Derron Jackson
Defendant:
Larry Bruton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marlon Barton v. George Bindwell, et al
as 12-10802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON K. BARTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE P. BINDWELL, Officer, MEYERS, Officer, DAVID P. BRUTON, Officer and others
Mell Bruton v. Michelle Casteel, et al
as 12-5707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELL T. BRUTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE CASTEEL, In her official and individual capacity and LYNN NOLAN, In her official and individual capacity
Mell Bruton v. Men of Valor-Prison Ministry, et al
as 12-5701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELL T. BRUTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MEN OF VALOR-PRISON MINISTRY, In its official and individual capacity and CARL CARLSEN, In his official and individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
