Cases 31 - 40 of 315
Donald McCray v. IRS, et al
as 23-2602
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald McCray
Defendant / Appellee:
Internal Revenue Service and Jerome B. Young
McCray v. IRS
as 23-4093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD MCCRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Chaloner Saintillus v. United States Supreme Court, et al
as 23-15793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHALONER SAINTILLUS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Mourning v. IRS-Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2023cv00970
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Mourning
Defendant:
IRS-Internal Revenue Service, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Franklin et al
as 1:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Donald Perry
Defendant:
Melissa Franklin, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Franklin et al
as 3:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
Donald Perry
Defendant:
Melissa Franklin, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Donald McCray
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Donald McCray
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Jerome B. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy et al v. IRS
as 4:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
Hickory McCoy and Marinda Heflin
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maestas v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Maestas
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
