Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Watford v. Goldman et al
as 8:2014cv03105
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Watford
Defendant:
Peter L. Goldman, William Connelly, Peter J. Messitte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watford v. Koppel et al
as 8:2014cv02738
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Watford
Defendant:
Robert Koppel and Chesepeake Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. United States et al
as 5:2014ct03060
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jomell Perry
Defendant:
United States, George E.B. Holding, Yvonne V. Watford-Mckinney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cottrell v. Clarke et al
as 3:2013cv00501
Plaintiff:
Christopher Earl Cottrell
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Eddie Pearson, David Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Nevada Department Public Safety et al
as 2:2013cv01318
Defendant:
C. Calloway, Division Parole and Probation, State of Nevada Department Public Safety and others
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATFORD v. SCIORE
as 1:2011cv05111
Plaintiff:
KENNY WATFORD
Defendant:
ROBERT SCIORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATFORD v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2011cv00104
Plaintiff:
IRONE WATFORD
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and GREG BARTKOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATFORD v. BALICKI
as 1:2010cv03650
Plaintiff:
KENNY WATFORD
Defendant:
ROBERT BALICKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATFORD v. MILLVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2009cv06111
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS L. WATFORD
Defendant:
MILLVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Joe v. Jon Ozmint
as 09-7914
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY JOE
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, Director of SCDC, JAMES SLIGH, Division Director, D. WATFORD, Caseworker and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
