Cases 41 - 50 of 21,830
Spalding v. United States et al
as 5:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
David L Spalding
Defendant:
United States and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Burleson County
as 24-50430
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Burleson County, Texas, Gene Hermes, Burleson County Sheriff, Judge Reva L. Townslee Corbett and others
Loggins v. Burleigh County et al
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Loggins
Defendant:
Burleigh County and Unknown Officers 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Page et al
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Cain and Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Sargent Noah Page, Jailer Ken Claud, Thomas Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Hermann et al
as 3:2024cv01422
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
C/O Hermann and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Keete Group
as 1:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Keete Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Gutierrez
as 24-50422
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, Chair Person; Pardon & Paroles, Eric J. R. Nichols, Chair Person; Texas Board Department of Criminal Justice, Governor Greg Abbott and others
Lucero et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lucero, Antonio Martinez, Antonio E. Cavasos and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbarker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Novak
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Abir Ali
Defendant:
Judge David J. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
