Cases 41 - 50 of 112
HAZEL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2017cv04460
Plaintiff:
JORDAN K. HAZEL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starkes v. Caliel et al
as 3:2017cv00385
Plaintiff:
Christan Lamar Starkes
Defendant:
Mark Caliel, Angela Corey, Pamela Hazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solis v. Collier et al
as 7:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Arturo Solis
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Brad Livingston, Dale Wainwright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards et al v. Enkler et al
as 1:2016cv09135
Plaintiff:
Bliss Edwards and Amina Faircloth
Defendant:
James Enkler, Drug Task Force Unit, Dutchess County N.Y. Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Foster v. Frankie Haynes, et al
as 16-11320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD FOSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANKIE L. HAYNES, CINDY F. HANEY, HAZELLE M. DAVIS and others
Burke v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04712
Defendant:
Asst Chief of Divisi Clayton Augustus, City of New York, Correction Officer Deliotte and others
Plaintiff:
Romario Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Donnelly et al
as 3:2016cv01052
Plaintiff:
LaQuinton Johnson
Defendant:
Marchelle Donnelly and Hazel Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Haynes, et al.
as 7:2016cv00065
Defendant:
Frankie L. Haynes , Cindy F Haney , Hazelle M Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kassan Morgan v. Dana Richards, et al
as 16-10245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KASSAN KHALID MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DANA RICHARDS, Correctional Officer, KIMBERLY SATTERFIELD, Correctional Officer, KEVIN DARDEN, Correctional Officer and others
Hazel v. Lappin et al
as 2:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Hazel
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Joe Driver, Jeff Boyles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
