Cases 41 - 50 of 136
Todie v. Garrison et al
as 3:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
Eugene A. Todie
Defendant:
Richard Garrison, J. Lyons, MaryAnn McKimpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Darrell Parks v. Andrew Edinger, et al
as 16-1588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW EDINGER, Medical Doctor, KEVIN PIGOS, Medical Director Doctor, FRANCIS FASCIANA, Mid Level Practioner and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DOE #1 ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, #710756-F1
JOE v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE EARL JOE
Defendant:
WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT and J. E. SWAIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
J. E. Wetzel, The Program Review Committee at SCI-Greene, The Psychiatric Review Team at SCI-Greene and others
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Rinaldi v. USA, et al
as 16-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RINALDI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARRELL WATTS, Central Office, BRYAN A. BLEDSOE and others
Logan v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv01489
Plaintiff:
Joe A Logan
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuel, Jr., . Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Davis v. J. Thoma
as 15-2927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN J. E. THOMAS
JOE v. WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv00668
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE EARL JOE
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT and J. E. SWAIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Argueta et al
as 1:2015cv01514
Plaintiff:
Darrell Parks
Defendant:
S. Argueta, T. Crawford, J. Oldt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Roberts et al
as 2:2015cv02985
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Williams
Defendant:
J E Roberts and Edward R Corvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
