Cases 41 - 50 of 943
Tillman v. Kent et al
as 4:2024cv10084
Plaintiff:
Travis Tillman
Defendant:
Kent, Montgomery, Ranson and others
Weigel v. Gray et al
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
James Allan Weigel
Defendant:
Lori Chambers Gray, Jason Cox and Mark Kent Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Warden Michael Feazell, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Pollan
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Christopher Casey Cook
Defendant:
Greg Pollan, Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, John Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2023cv01928
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Harris
Defendant:
State of Washington, City of Everett, City of Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Clay
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, CMC/LITMB, TDCJ Parole Release and Process Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hull v. Yost et al
as 2:2023cv03940
Plaintiff:
Seain C. Hull
Defendant:
David Yost, Matthew Crall, Scott Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
