Cases 41 - 50 of 699
Pearson v. New York, State of et al
as 1:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Robert Pearson, Jr
Defendant:
New York, State of and Correctional Officer Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnel v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Marquis Kinnel
Defendant:
Brown, Gooley, Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petion v. Pearson et al
as 3:2022cv01647
Plaintiff:
Divenson Petion
Defendant:
Pearson, McNeil, Blevons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Qian Williams
Defendant:
Dale Taylor, Kenneth Baker, Karl Kadon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaymes Stark v. Jana Hacker, et al
as 22-3448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jaymes Anthony Stark
Defendant / Appellee:
Jana Hacker, Karen Anderson, Dr. Joel Kosinski and others
Sherman v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
Melvin Frank Sherman, III
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmitt Pearson, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 22-7277
Petitioner / Appellant:
EMMITT PEARSON, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Rankins v. Pearson et al
as 3:2022cv03036
Plaintiff:
Danny Wayne Rankins
Defendant:
Cortney Pearson, Dimitrius Bowens, Boatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy Ferguson, III v. Janiece Price, et al
as 22-35820
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY ELIZE FERGUSON III
Defendant / Appellee:
JANIECE PRICE, Bannock County Prosecutor Attorney, SCOTT A. PEARSON, Public Defender and STATE OF IDAHO
Rankins v. Pearson et al
as 4:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Danny Wayne Rankins
Defendant:
Cortney Pearson, Dimitrius Bowens, Boatman and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
