Cases 41 - 50 of 2,623
Dyson v. Stevens et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, Danielle Tucker, Illinois Department of Children and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Smith v. Dharawat et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Robert L Smith
Defendant:
Ramesh Dharawat, J Ma, Walter Chien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADISON v. BERRY et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephon Hopkins v. Jacob Walters
as 24-6001
Plaintiff:
STEPHON LEKEITH HOPKINS
Defendant:
JACOB A. WALTERS, Officer and AUSTIN FOWLER, Officer
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENNEY v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
WALTER LAWRENCE KENNEY
Defendant:
GDC COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, DR MICHAEL WOODARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATEO v. CASON et al
as 3:2023cv23229
Plaintiff:
LOUIS MATEO
Defendant:
WALTER DELEON CASON, TAYLOR SHIELA, MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarren et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv13129
Plaintiff:
Michael David McCarren, Maurice Stewart, Levertis Riley and others
Defendant:
Raphael Washington, Robert Dunlap, Boyer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
