Cases 51 - 60 of 62
De La Garza v. McGill et al
as 3:2009cv01698
Plaintiff:
Cesar De La Garza
Defendant:
Jeffery McGill, Wayne Choinski, Frederick Levesque and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tonelli v. Doe et al
as 2:2009cv00155
Plaintiff:
Luciano Tonelli
Defendant:
John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe, Terry Woodland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Carlsen et al
as 9:2008cv00965
Plaintiff:
Nilas Thompson, III
Defendant:
Scott C. Carlsen, Jane Doe, Ms. Sarkowski and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rice v. Doe, et al
as 08-20381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SKYLER THOMAS RICE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN #1 DOE, JOHN #2 DOE and JOHN #3 DOE
Shanklin v. Fernald, et al
as 08-50343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DALE SHANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. FERNALD, Special Agent IRS-CID, MCKINNIES, AGENT NFN MCKINNIES, Special Agent in Charge IRS-CID, HARLAN CARTER, Special Agent in Charge and others
Shanklin v. Fernald, et al
as 08-50342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DALE SHANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. FERNALD, Special Agent IRS-CID, MCKINNIES, AGENT NFN MCKINNIES, Special Agent in Charge IRS-CID, HARLAN CARTER, Special Agent in Charge and others
Page v. Doe, et al.
as 3:2008cv05215
Plaintiff:
Alexander Page
Defendant:
John 1 Doe and John 2 Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Doe et al
as 3:2008cv00230
Plaintiff:
Daven Demetrius Brown
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, John #2 Doe, John #3 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Doe et al
as 5:2007cv00224
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Rogers
Defendant:
John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Doe et al
as 7:2007cv00161
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Rogers
Defendant:
John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
