Cases 51 - 60 of 406
Sawyer v. Stinson et al
as 3:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Matthew Caleb Sawyer
Defendant:
Chris Stinson, Tommy Farmers, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
Alexander Coleman
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, P Tucker, K9 Cairo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sawyer v. County of Boone et al
as 2:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Sawyer
Defendant:
County of Boone, Sheriff Michael Helmig, Sheriff Deputy Tracy Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corpus v. Secretary Department of Children and Families et al
as 2:2022cv00006
Petitioner:
Andrew Corpus
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Emily Salema, Jon Carner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irizarry v. Masters et al
as 2:2021cv00905
Plaintiff:
Fernando Antonio Irizarry
Defendant:
Melinda Masters, Donald Sawyer, Brian Libel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORPUS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES et al
as 4:2021cv00478
Plaintiff:
ANDREW CORPUS
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, EMILY SALEMA, JON CARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Witkin v. Snelling et al
as 2:2021cv02181
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Witkin
Defendant:
C. Snelling, W. Brodie, V. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nealy v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2021cv00640
Plaintiff:
Tonnie Nealy
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer and Emily Salema
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. LA Indigent Defender Board
as 5:2021cv02017
Plaintiff:
Sawyer Harrison
Defendant:
LA Indigent Defender Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crittington v. McFadden et al
as 3:2021cv00314
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden, Savory Sheryl Drakeford, K. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Dupraz Crittington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
