Cases 51 - 60 of 247
Arnold v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00392
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arnold
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Andrew Mark Skier, Talladega County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Alabama v. Johns (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Charles Kelvin Johns
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnold v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00103
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arnold
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Andrew Mark Skier, Talladega County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00083
Defendant:
David Sutton, State of Alabama, Lee Holley and others
Plaintiff:
Shadey Bron Melvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00062
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arnold
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Andrew Mark Skier, Talladega County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruise v. State of Alabama
as 1:2018cv00524
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Judge Ben Brooks and Steve Marshall
Plaintiff:
Harold David Cruise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotner v. Johnson (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00764
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Russell County Jail, Steve Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Edward Cotner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Freddrick et al
as 2:2018cv01334
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Freddrick
Petitioner:
Gerald Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Circuit Court of Madison County et al
as 5:2018cv00741
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Idris Wilson
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Madison County, State of Alabama, STAC Team and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
